In this post, I respond to a comment from LibSocialistssuck.
Dear LibSocialistssuck,
Thanks for your comment.
I'll respond.
1) You say: "you..say that pepole only use income from investments to pay mortgages."
I don't say that people only use investment income to make mortgage payments, but I see why you say I did. The post wasn't too clear here. Thanks for alerting me.
Obviously, people pay their bills with whatever cash or credit they have, whether a consumer credit card, income from investments or work, etc... Money is money, right?
2) You say "People have MORE money due to tax cuts."
This is true if you get caught up in one statistic. But a broader look at statistics suggests the opposite.
It's doubtful the middle class has more money overall, and they certainly have less spending power. As I wrote in the post (and as the NYT article detailed) incomes have gone down over the past five years when adjusted for inflation by $476. So, according to the limited statistics we have, incomes actually went down $158.
And, even if this weren't true, you'll at least agree with me that $318 really doesn't buy much these days? Won't you?
3) You say: "People have the freedom to spend their money how they choose"
I agree with you completely. But I don't see how this relates to the post or the current volatility in world markets. Perhaps you will clarify in a new comment?
4) You say: "People CHOSE to get mortgages on variable rates/ballon payments... ...it's Bush's fault how?"
It's not Bush's fault that people took variable rate loans. I don't say that.
You're right. They did choose. And now they're feeling the consequences. Nowhere do I mean to gloss over their mistakes.
The broader point is that a tax-code that leaves the debt-saddled middle class down to their very last dollar at the end of every month sets a trap for economic implosion when both they and others make financial mistakes. The defaulters borrowed irresponsibly, true. But lenders also lent irresponsibly. Wall Streeters rated bonds irresponsibly. In short, a lot of wild stuff has happened.
Problems have many causes. I picked this cause because no one else seems to be making the connection.
To tell you the truth, I'm really not too concerned about whether its Bush's fault.
But a tax system that does not leave room for the errors of ordinary citizens in finance is a tax system that ignores reality and makes the larger American system more susceptible to shocks.
My concern is that the United States have a tax codes that supports the economic system through tough times. A good tax code would push a bit more money into the pockets of the middle class so they could make their debt payments, while only raising capital gains a tad, so that cash could move (again) at the top.
That would preserve stability.